Would Juluis caesar be a good king

Would Julius Caesar be a keen mightiness? Julius Caesar takes correct in ancient Rome in 44 B. C. He was never technically major power, besides he came close to having the powers of a king, but he got killed before he could become oneness. He is very arrogant passim the story while he is still alive. He is pretty pertinacious while being p retty manipulative sound like roughly every character in the play. I dont feel like he will be a good king just because of his arrogance. He also had his good qualities like being a military astermind.Caesar shows us his arrogance throughout the play. For example in Act 1 motion-picture show 2 he says Such men as he be never at hearts ease Whiles they behold a smashinger than themselves, and wherefore are they very dangerous. I rather tell thee what is to be feard than what I fear, for always I am Caesar . In this quote we can make up ones mind that is Caesar unashamed of how arrogant he is being. This arrogance would cause him to do different errors like he did later in the story like ignoring his wifes dreamHe was great ruler because he led Rome in the right direction, but by doing so, in the process he was an arrogant and selfish ruler. He was great for Rome as a ruler but not for the people. Just like Brutus said in Act 2 guesswork 1 And therefore think him as a serpents egg which, natchd, would, as his kind, grow mischievous, and ill shell. Here Brutus is comparing Caesar to a Serpents Egg that is should be destroyed before it hatches and becomes dangerous if he becomes king.They are not horror-struck of him ecause he is a tyrant but will become one if he becomes the king of Rome. In the book Julius Caesar manipulation seems like a varsity sport. In Act 2 Scene 1 Caesar in truth deceives the Romans. He is putting a show and refusing that he doesnt want the circus tent, until now though he would secretly love it deep inside. He thinks that refusal to the crown in front of the public is a smart politic al tactical manoeuvre to get people to love him and think he less overambitious or for lack of better word desperate.This is also a exercise of reverse hycology as Caesar is using it to make the crowd like him and all the same consider making him king as he is not grabby and hungry for it. In conclusion Caesar would be a great king for Rome but not for the Romans. He is a genius in warfare but is very arrogant which cost him his life. If he was king his arrogance would definitely be his downfall. And the romans would find out that he was manipulating them, it was Just a matter of time. He would be a very good war chief of be a ruler with Pompey but not a king all by himself.