Organic Foods: Is It Worth It? Essay

natural forages cost more than mending sustenance, but argon they worth it? Is it really better for your health? And atomic number 18 they really more nutritious? Should you buy organic forage hitherto though you be a student and has truly little specie? These be all brains that subscribe probably passed through your mind nowadays that you no longer have your parents to go grocery shopping and organize for you. But because there are no research that can put forward that have organic is healthier, and there is no research that shows that feeding invariable food is just as healthy, no real answer for your question exists.However, there are some articles like Alex Bergers Organic nourishments are a healthy Alternative and Nancy Spragues Counterpoint Organic nutrient is Unnecessary and the Current nutrition Supply is Safe that can financial aid you make a decision. Alex Berger, the writer of Organic Foods are a fitter Alternative, however, believes that eating or ganic food is not only just to sensations health organic foods also have many an(prenominal) other benefits. He says, Organic foods tend to be richer in nutrients, perhaps because they are grown in soil with more complex micronutrients.1 Gerber and then continues to say that organic foods have more than just health and nutritionary benefits it also has environmental benefits and social st talent. 2 Berger views organic foods as a friend. Although, they are expensive, they are much healthier, provide much more nutrition, and they also second the environment. The benefits of organic foods outweigh the negativities that were never mentioned in his article. Berbers argument is actually persuasive. His words makes the reader tonicity moved to believe that organic food is healthy, such as agricultural chemicals may pose a great risk to some individual.3 His threat makes the reader shade scared that eating normal, processed food can harm them, which will lead readers to feel tha t organic food is the healthier option. Although Berger seems to be a very authentic source, Berger is just a writer with no scientific background leave off for a PhD in Anthropology, a degree that doesnt have anything to do with nutrition. This makes him seem to be a rather unreliable source for nutritionary advice. Another writer, Nancy Sprague, thinks otherwise. She believes that the food supply that we have now is safe as it is.Organic food is an unnecessary luxury that is expensive and there is no guarantee that it is healthier. She says, When food is defined as organic, it simply means that the maker has employed an ap turn outd organic food production systemthe manufacturing business is not guaranteeing the safety or quality of the product. By being misled into believe that buying organic guarantees food safety, consumers are somemagazines more likely to be harmed by an organic food than by one purchased from a commercial supplier. 4.Sprague views organic food as a luxur ious occurrence that she doesnt need. She argues that there are no research that can prove organic food is healthier. Instead, research have shown that organic food has as many bacteria, vitamins, and etc. as processed food. 5 Spragues method of paper easily persuades her readers. Her choice of words scares readers into believing that the organic industrys goal is to fool their consumers. For example, she says, Organic raw mulch is outlawed by many farm bureaus because it is likely to carry pathogens and infective potential.In one sentence, Sprague overrides the other sides argument that organic food is safer, and points out that sooner of being safe, organic food is more likely to carry infectious bacteria. This scares readers into wondering whether or not the organic food industry is fabrication and forces readers to think, have I been a fool for trusting the companies advertisements all this time? Spragues writing style of inflicting fear and doubt into the reader makes reade rs feel that she is a knowledgeable source.This in turn develops her credibility as an germ in nutrition. However, before trusting Sprague completely, readers have to realize that her opinions are very one-sided and they should question their trust in all of her information. Both sides have points that make their side very convincing, some(prenominal) sides have research that proves their points, and some(prenominal) sides have important things to say. However, in the end it is still up you, as the reader, to decide what you want in your food.It is up to you to decide if you want debris food, healthy food, and/ or organic food. But, you have to choose wisely because food has the power to decide your future. Food affects everything from your weight, to your health, and many times it even has the ability to affect your person as a whole. Today, you might be eating a cheeseburger, but tomorrow you might be in the infirmary emergency room with a heart attack. This is why a a few( prenominal) bad food choices can put your education and, maybe one day, even your life in imminent danger.Overall, what goes into our food is so important that both sides of the argument agree that the government has and needs regulations that force both regular food processors and organic farmers to meet and that the EPA has and needs their standards to rise always to improve our food source. Both authors believe what you put into your mouth is an important issue. But, their beliefs are not enough to change the world. In the end, their belief systems are not the most important thing because you are the one who chooses what you eat. You are the one who has to find the answer.So, please tell me, who are you and which side of the food debate are you on? Bibliography Berger, Adam. Point Organic Foods are a Healthier Alternative. Points of take up Reference snapper EBSCOhost. August 2009. (accessed June 14, 2010). Lindner, Larry. Organically self-aggrandising Food Is it Really a Be tter Choice?. surroundings release EBSCOhost. May 2002. (accessed June 14, 2010). Peterson, Elizabeth. Organic Foods To Buy or Not To Buy?. Environment Complete EBSCOhost. October 2004. (accessed June 14, 2010). Sprague, Nancy. Counterpoint Organic Food is Unnecessary & the Current Food Supply is Safe. Points of View Reference Center EBSCOhost. 2009. (accessed June 14, 2010). 1 Adam Berger, Point Organic Foods are a Healthier Alternative, Points of View Organic Food (August 2009) 2. Points of View Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed June 14, 2010). 2 Adam Berger, Point Organic Foods are a Healthier Alternative, Points of View Organic Food (August 2009) 3 Ibid. 2. 4 Nancy Sprague, Counterpoint Organic Food is Unnecessary & the Current Food Supply is Safe, (2009) 3, Points of View Reference Center EBSCOhost (accessed June 14, 2010). 5 Ibid.