.

Thursday, March 21, 2019

American Drug Laws- Do They He :: essays research papers fc

American Drug Laws Do They Help or mischief? I believe the dose laws argon in serious contain of reform. We tend to forget that alcohol is a drug and that at unrivalled time it was prohibited without success. Also, I believe that a civil eubstance of government rather than a criminal one should regulate drug lend oneself. It is a social problem, not a criminal one. As a largely victimless criminal offence they should not countenance their civil rights taken apart just beca hire they like to take drugs which we have arbitrarily made illegal. Drugs are very expensive beca enforce they are illegal. Their procurement and give fuel crime and violence, which could be largely eliminated if organized crime did not have a monopoly and the free enterprise system could control the market. Potency regulated by licensed drug companies would prevent unusually pure substances from causing unintended overdose. There is an epidemic of unnecessary deaths from this cause. This problem is ex acerbated by the fear users and bystanders have of seeking a highly effective antidote for drug inebriation that is universally available at hospitals. The U.S. drug laws violate our right to privacy, monetary value millions in tax revenue, overloads the criminal justice system, and are ineffective as a deterrent to drug use and trafficking. Laws that govern drug use are patently arbitrary and have their bases in racial mischief and the comfort index of old male legislators. The first opium regulatory laws were enacted in San Francisco in response to Asian immigrants entertaining married white women in opium dens (Hamowy). The American and European tolerance for tobacco and alcohol use art object fearing "counter-culture" marijuana, cocaine, and heroin is a strong prejudice based on ignorance of the relative human misery caused by the inevitable misuse of mind-altering substances. alcoholic beverage and tobacco cause more illness and death each grade than all the illici t drugs combined. Legislative attempts to curb alcohol and tobacco use by children makes some of these very vulnerable people desire their use, scarcely the age-restrictive and the accompanying time-of-purchase limits on widely abused drugs are the best that society has devised. Our knowledge of education techniques to encourage abstinence or moderate use of drugs is extremely inadequate. Laws for prevention of illegal drug use are wildly unsuccessful and have burdened in making drug-related criminals the majority of incarcerated offenders in U.S. prisons. The result of illegalizing use, and not necessarily abuse at all, is a 100% affix in drug criminals in the last ten years (Hamowy) for use of substances which have no more, and probably less, intrinsic potential for abuse.

No comments:

Post a Comment