Political Sponsering of Ngos Essay

Greenpeace and green governmental pop outies atomic number 18 united in their position against nuclear energy and their support for renewable energies. Christian generosity organizations and conservative governmental parties both stand for traditional family values and against family planning. that does this mean they should work together? Often political parties sponsor NGOs, tho is this sponsoring even acceptable? There argon several arguments which we would the like to consider. The credibility of NGOs as independent organizations and their ability to pursue their social interests are harmed by political sponsoring.The credibility of NGOs decreases, because much often than non, the interests of political parties are more important than the original agenda of the NGOs, due to (financial) sponsoring. The reason for political parties to subscribe with NGOs in the form of political sponsoring is to increase attention for the statements on the political agenda. NGOs often shoot more resources and are less restrained to completely sorts of rules and laws to protest in rigorous actions.However, this money nates only be invested when the NGO via medias its own agenda with the agenda of the political party, which means that they capacity have to compromise on their own values, missions and visions. Hence the question rises how goat an NGO be refered non-governmental when there is a political influence? A counterargument for this is that there is a difference between a political party and the government. Of course this is the case, but a political party is a part of the government. In the Netherlands it is even the case that the political parties get subsidy by the government, so these are inseparable.Thus we argue you gutter? t c only a NGO non-governmental anymore when it is sponsored by political parties, which significantly decreases their credibility. egalitarian control of political action that is outsourced to NGOs and is therefore beyond democratic control. When a political party is chosen to participate in a demesnes parliament, this is entere in a democratic way. People can select for the party that has arguments and goals closest to the persons own vision. However, the card of an NGO is not chosen in a democratic way, they are simply hired because they are the right person to do the commerce.When NGOs will engage in political actions, people who are not democratically chosen will gain political power. The accountability of political parties to their stakeholders, in particular those who may not agree with the objectives of the NGOs that are sponsored, is harmed by political sponsoring. When people vote democratically for a political party, they vote for the agenda the political party has before engaging with any another(prenominal) organization. When political parties go and sponsor NGOs, the party more or less likely has to compromise on its own agenda to get to an agreement with an NGO. Citizens now are voting for NGOs without knowing this.The voters do often not have a say in which NGOs are sponsored, so there is a corking likelihood that part of the political partys stakeholders will not approve of the chosen NGOs at all. The missions and visions of these organizations could be in contradiction with the opinions of the stakeholders and voters, and they have absolutely no control over this. Proponents of political sponsoring say that the voters taket compromise, because they have the same goal as the political parties. We would like to stress here that even though someone has the same goal, you dont have to agree with the actions that are taken.Especially actions of NGOs, which are most commonly known as radical, can get a dole out of resistance by the voters and other stakeholders of the political parties. An important question you can ask yourself in the light of this last argument is Does the end beg off the means? Does the common goal lead to an acceptance of all (radical ) actions taken by NGOs? This is an important question, especially for the stakeholders of the political party, because by political sponsoring all the stakeholders of the parties (including the voters) indirectly approve of the NGOs actions.